5 key conclusions as the January 6 trial reaches its final stage

But as it prepares its biggest findings, committee members face important choices about how to close its study, as well as what features are left alone.

Here are five endcom scenes the team must face before going public:

Donald Trump calls: if not, but when, how

The group is almost certain to testify to Trump; This has long been seen as a promising process. While members of the panel have been cautious about the question of whether to summon the former president, court hearings – and a landmark ruling by a federal judge – have revealed conclusive evidence that he tried to break the law during their trial. Quiet power transfer.

“We will talk about the possibility of a Trump interview in the not-too-distant future,” said Jan. 6 committee chairman Rep. Penny Thompson (D-Miss.) Told reporters Thursday. Told the Washington Post He will consider testifying depending on the subject matter of the panel’s request.

Thompson then Told CNN The demand for Trump may be voluntary, not through Sapona. In 1953, only one former president, Harry Truman, confronted Congressman Sapona. Very publicly Refused to comply. The DOJ has long cited the Truman example as a significant precedent in legal arguments against subpoenaing presidents or their advisers.

Team members attribute Trump’s unification to the January 6 violence. But Trump has not been expected to cooperate with the group he has ridiculed for months. It is not yet clear whether the group wants Trump to volunteer or take a more confrontational approach.

Pence’s last January 6 call with Trump

One of the committee’s key final decisions is whether to testify to former Vice President Mike Pence, a debate that touches on Trump’s pressure campaign, which will try to thwart Pence’s election alone.

Thompson recently suggested that Pence’s testimony may be unnecessary. Many of his top advisers spoke in depth on the committee. His chief executive, Mark Short, and top lawyer Greg Jacob gave the panel a small account of Benz’s efforts to thwart Trump’s attempt before January 6.

But both Short And Jacob Benz clarified that there is a significant piece of evidence that only Benz can provide: On January 6, when the two last spoke before Benz came to the Capitol to preside over Congress, Jan. What he said to Trump during a phone call on the morning of the 6th. Certificate of Electoral Votes.

Short and Jacob said Pence took the call in a separate room and did not tell them about it. In fact, Jacob told the select committee that it was Pence’s practice to “never disclose the contents” of his conversations with Trump.

During the Trump-Benz call, Trump was released by his children Ivanka, Dan Jr. and Eric, as well as Kimberly Gilfoyle, attorney Eric Hershman, chief of staff Mark Meadows and National Security Assistant Keith Kellogg. Selection Committee. In the panel’s testimony, Kellogg outlined the side of Trump’s call, a final attempt to persuade Pence to block President Joe Biden’s election vote unilaterally.

But there is no public record of Pence’s page of the call, including how he responded to Trump’s last pressure. Short said Benz had made it clear for weeks that he had no authority to change the election results, but the direct and last January 6 exchange between Trump and Benz has been blurry.

Will the Speaker speak?

Another key decision facing the select committee is whether to testify before Speaker Nancy Pelosi or Senate GOP President Mitch McConnell as part of the January 6 hearing on security decisions. The two leaders jointly oversee the security of the Capitol through House and Senate sergeants, but play a lesser role in the day-to-day operations of the Capitol police and other security officials.

Among security officers, the panel has heard in recent months from House Sergeant William Walker and Capitol Police Chiefs who headed the DC National Guard on January 6, 2021. Despite the committee’s efforts to investigate security breaches during the attack, Republican lawmakers have long claimed the group ignored the issue.

The House Investigators’ decision on Pelosi was particularly significant because he was the target of several months of attacks by Republican lawmakers on January 6 who tried to portray him as a sole culprit for the failures of the Capitol defense. Trump has stepped up particularly shameful attacks on Pelosi, who was targeted by several rioters who broke into the building.

The Speaker publicly sought to distance himself from the work of the Committee, but stated that he would co-operate if asked. “It’s up to the committee who the committee is asking,” said Pelosi spokesman Drew Hamil.

House Republicans have promised to investigate Pelosi’s role if he wins a majority next year, so his testimony would be a foregone conclusion to those efforts.

What to do with Mo Brooks and GOP holdouts

Three GOP legislators who refused to participate in voluntary interviews – GOP President Kevin McCarthy and representatives. The team has not shown its hand on whether Pennsylvania’s Scott Perry and Ohio’s Jim Jordan – or will fight to get it. Testimony of other Republican lawmakers who worked with Trump before Jan. 6.

Thompson pointed out that saponies are unlikely, at least, to result in lengthy legal battles, as legislators have constitutional protections. Officially, no decision has been made.

The dynamic last month was most interesting amid the comments of Representative Mo Brooks (R-AL), one of Trump’s early allies in the fight to overthrow the January 6 election. After Trump withdrew his approval from Brooks’ backward Senate candidacy, the Alabama legislator publicly suggested that Trump continued his efforts to “reverse” the 2020 election results after leaving the White House.

Trump Told the Post Brooks said he never claimed to have been charged, creating a conflict that could have been resolved by affidavit.

When asked about Trump’s comments, Brooks told Politico, “My memory is different from his.” On one The most overlooked podcast Last month, Brooks described resisting Trump’s motivation and providing a soundtrack that could feature in any findings against the former president.

“That’s not something Donald Trump wants to hear, someone is in disagreement and he will not go out and take out marching orders regardless of whether it is allowed by law,” Brooks said.

Keeping the record open

Although the select committee has published most of its findings, the book is unlikely to be closed during the panel’s investigation. Other witnesses may come forward, and the National Archives – which sends Trump White House documents to investigators – is likely to continue to produce new installments for weeks or months.

Nearly two dozen lawsuits initiated by unwilling witnesses are still pending, and court victories for the panel could lead to new bursts of documents, testimonies and phone records.

This included a persistent attempt to obtain thousands of emails sent by Attorney John Eastman, who helped Trump design a marginal legal strategy to push Pence to thwart the election. Similarly, the group has been embroiled in a quick legal battle with the Republican National Committee for records related to post-GOP 2020 election news that provoked misinformation about electoral integrity.

Thompson opened the door to the release of all of the panel’s documents at the end of its investigation, which could be crucial to the January 6 organizational hearing on the organizers.

“It will be paid for at the expense of public documents, taxpayers,” he told reporters.

Leave a Comment